Sugar-sweetened beverages, low/no-calorie beverages, fruit juice and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease defined by fatty liver index: the SWEET project.

Nutrition & diabetes. 2023;13(1):6

Plain language summary

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) refers to a broad range of liver disorders and the major determinants of NAFLD include sedentary lifestyles and poor-quality diets, namely high sugar intake. The main aim of this study was to investigate the association between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), low/no-calorie beverages (LNCB), and fruit juice (FJ) intakes and fatty liver index (FLI)-defined NAFLD. This study represents harmonised data of four European studies; Lifelines Cohort study, the Nutrition Questionnaire Plus study, the PREDIMED-Plus study, and the Alpha Omega Cohort. Results showed adverse associations between SSB and LNCB intakes and FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence, as well as between replacement of SSB with the same amount of LNCB and FLI-defined NAFLD. Furthermore, there was a beneficial association between moderate intake of FJ and FLI-defined NAFLD at intake level of ≤2 servings/day when compared to no intake. Authors conclude that long-term prospective studies with objective methods determining the intake of sugar and sweeteners are warranted to further substantiate the findings of their study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Sweetened beverage intake may play a role in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) development, but scientific evidence on their role is limited. This study examined associations between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), low/no-calorie beverages (LNCB) and fruit juice (FJ) intakes and NAFLD in four European studies. METHODS Data for 42,024 participants of Lifelines Cohort, NQPlus, PREDIMED-Plus and Alpha Omega Cohort were cross-sectionally analysed. NAFLD was assessed using Fatty Liver Index (FLI) (≥60). Restricted cubic spline analyses were used to visualize dose-response associations in Lifelines Cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses with robust variance were performed for associations in individual cohorts; data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Models were adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and other dietary factors. RESULTS Each additional serving of SSB per day was associated with a 7% higher FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence (95%CI 1.03-1.11). For LNCB, restricted cubic spline analysis showed a nonlinear association with FLI-defined NAFLD, with the association getting stronger when consuming ≤1 serving/day and levelling off at higher intake levels. Pooled Cox analysis showed that intake of >2 LNCB servings/week was positively associated with FLI-defined NAFLD (PR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.61; reference: non-consumers). An inverse association was observed for FJ intake of ≤2 servings/week (PR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97; reference: non-consumers), but not at higher intake levels. Theoretical replacement of SSB with FJ showed no significant association with FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence (PR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00), whereas an adverse association was observed when SSB was replaced with LNCB (PR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.21). CONCLUSIONS Pooling results of this study showed that SSB and LNCB were positively associated with FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence. Theoretical replacement of SSB with LNCB was associated with higher FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence. An inverse association was observed between moderate intake of FJ and FLI-defined NAFLD. Our results should be interpreted with caution as reverse causality cannot be ruled out.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Detoxification and biotransformational
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood

Methodological quality

Jadad score : Not applicable
Allocation concealment : Not applicable

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease ; NAFLD ; Sweeteners